I know not everyone will like this view of leadership. It leaves too much unsaid. Won’t we end up with too many bad or unethical leaders or even “non-leaders”?
I would say we already have them, and giving a textbook-perfect definition of leadership won’t change that. If you want to understand leadership, study all kinds of leaders, both the good and bad ones.
The negative examples like Nixon actually teach us a lot about the failures of leadership, helping us understand what authentic leadership is.
If you want to practice good leadership, be the kind of person and do the things that people naturally want to follow you.